Compare · Coshell vs Devin

Devin works on its own. Coshell is a team working with one agent, live.

Devin is an autonomous AI engineer you delegate tasks to. Coshell is the opposite shape: a shared live session where your whole team and one agent build together, in the loop. Two different jobs, compared honestly.

Devin is autonomous
You assign Devin a task or a ticket, and it works on its own in its own cloud environment, then opens a pull request. For well-scoped, delegatable work it is a genuinely capable async engineer.
Coshell is collaborative
Coshell is the opposite shape: a whole team and one agent in a shared live session, building together in real time, with humans in the loop the whole way.
Different jobs
This is not better versus worse. It is delegate-and-review versus build-together. Many teams want both.

Devin takes a task and works on it on its own.Coshell puts a team and one agent in the same live session, building together.

One agent, one live session, the whole team prompting it together.

What Coshell is for.

Not a more autonomous agent. The shared live session your team and one agent work in together, in real time. Every line below is running in production today.

01 · in the loop, not at the bookends

A team co-drives one agent, live

With Devin you are at the bookends: scope the task, review the PR. In Coshell several people prompt one shared agent in one live session, steering and correcting it together as the work happens, on one running filesystem and terminal.

02 · many people, one agent

Multiplayer among humans, not many bots

Devin's parallelism is many agents, one per task. Coshell's is many people, up to 5 teammates on one drive, working with a single shared agent in the same session, with presence and follow so you can watch a teammate steer.

03 · per drive, not usage

Predictable per-drive price

Devin's cost scales with agent compute. Coshell is free to self-host, no seats: run a drive on your own machine, up to five teammates in your org, unmetered. Bring your own model keys across 70+ models, billed by your provider.

04 · your real repo

Runs your repo, pushes to your real git

A Coshell drive works in your existing codebase and pushes to your own repositories as ordinary git, so the work lands the way your reviewers expect. Live collaboration in the session feeds your normal pull-request flow rather than replacing it.

Coshell vs Devin, side by side.

Devinautonomous · asyncCoshellcollaborative · live
Core shapeAutonomous agent you delegate a task toLive shared session a team co-drives with one agent
Human roleAt the bookends: assign the task, review the PRIn the loop throughout, steering the agent live
CollaborationMany agents in parallel, one per taskMany people in one shared session with one agent
Pricing basisUsage-based, scales with agent computeFree to self-host, no seats
Team sizePriced by usage and seatsUp to 5 teammates per drive
ModelsBundled model access by planBring your own keys, 70+ models
Where code livesDevin's own cloud environment, opens PRs to your repoYour existing repo; pushes to your real git
Best forDelegating well-scoped async tickets at scaleBuilding together with an agent, live

Devin is built to work on its own. Coshell is built for a team to work with an agent, together.

Use both

Delegate to Devin. Build together on Coshell.

These are complementary, not competing. Hand Devin the well-scoped async tickets, and bring your team into a Coshell drive for the work that is better done together: pairing, live debugging, onboarding, review. Coshell runs your own repo on your own keys and pushes to your real git.

Built on OpenCode

Coshell is built on OpenCode, the open agent engine, and adds the shared session your whole team works in together.

Coshell vs Devin, answered

Is Coshell trying to be a more autonomous Devin?

No. They are different shapes of AI coding. Devin is autonomous and asynchronous: you delegate a task and it works on its own, then opens a pull request. Coshell is collaborative and synchronous: a team and one agent work together in a live session, with humans steering the whole time. Coshell's value is the live, in-the-loop collaboration, not running unattended.

When would I use Devin instead of Coshell?

When you have well-scoped, delegatable work you would rather hand off than do together: clear tickets, routine fixes, migrations you can review as a PR, or many independent tasks you want to run in parallel while you are away. That fire-and-forget, ticket-to-PR pattern is exactly what Devin is built for.

When is Coshell the better fit?

When the work is better done together than delegated: pairing on a feature, debugging a hard bug as a team, onboarding a new engineer, or reviewing the running app live. Coshell puts your whole team and one agent in the same live session, so the people who need to be in the room are in the room, in real time.

Can we use both Devin and Coshell?

Yes, and many teams would. Use Devin to delegate async tickets at scale, and use Coshell for the live, collaborative work: pairing, debugging together, onboarding, exploratory sessions. They are different jobs, and both push to your real git.

Build with your team, live.

Open a drive in the browser, or attach from the CLI. Put your whole team and one agent in the same live session, on the code you already have.